Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Brittin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 15, 1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Iu case. On motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtHornblower, C. J.
Two questions were raised and very fully discussed on the argument:
I. Was Woodruff a competent witness to prove the facts offered to be proved by him?
II. Were the facts offered to be proved, material to the issue?
Upon this latter question, no opinion was intimated at the Circuit; but if this court shall be of opinion that Woodruff was a competent witness, there will be no use of sending the cause back to the Circuit, if the matter offered in evidence, was immaterial to the issue. It may therefore become necessary to examine both points: and,
I. Was Wm. B. Woodruff a competent witness?
He was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Lloyd v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969