Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Sudbury

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1966No. 10298Published

1Opinion of the Court

18 Utah 2d 140 (1966)

417 P.2d 646

EARL BONNER, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

GEORGE W. SUDBURY AND MRS. GEORGE W. SUDBURY, HIS WIFE, AND BETH L. DAVIS, DEFENDANTS, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,

v.

SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, MRS. JOHN J. HUNT, ZION'S SECURITY CORPORATION, VERE L. MATHEWS AND SHIRLEY SEEHOLZER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

No. 10298.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 28, 1966.

Leland S. McCullough, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Galen Ross, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff sued to prevent the defendants from using the dead end street, called…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Harkness v. WoodmanseeUtah Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Chicago v. BordenIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Brown v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API