Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Ward

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1968No. Civ. 11513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN,

Defendants Ward are landowners who appeal from a judgment fixing damages in an eminent domain action. The suit was brought by the State Department of Public Works to acquire a triangular-shaped parcel of about six acres, leaving the Wards with 46.5 acres; to extinguish a permanent easement of access between the Wards' remaining land and the neighboring freeway (Interstate 5), which had been created by a 1951 agreement between the state and the Wards’ predecessors; providing the Wards, however, a right of access to a nearby county road in lieu of that easement. One of the issues in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People ex rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. ScheinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research LtdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API