Legal Opinion

Walck Bros. AG. Service v. Suburban Pipeline Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and second cause of action dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for partial *1005summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action alleging that defendant Suburban Pipeline Co., Inc. (Suburban) violated Labor Law § 220-a (1). Suburban was a contractor, and plaintiff its subcontractor, on a public works project for the City of Lockport. Pursuant to a ruling by the Department of Labor, plaintiff was required to pay its employees approximately $40,000 in additional wages for having failed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Photo Lab Fabrications, Inc. v. Manshul Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P & T Iron Works v. Talisman Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Pavlou v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API