Legal Opinion

Kessler v. M. Halff & Bro.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from De Witt. Tried below before Hon. James C. Wilson.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Associate Justice

About the 27th day of September, 1897, A. G-. Wangemann, a merchant at Yoakum, was found by appellant Kessler, his father-in-law, t,o be insolvent, and on that day Kessler, who claimed that Wangemann owed him $15,000, and Wangemann, who acknowledged such indebtedness, executed an instrument in writing, signed by both, the terms of which were to the following effect: Wangemann conveyed to Kessler (1) his stock of goods, implements, iron safe, all items of merchandise, fixtures, show cases, and all personal property belonging to him situate in a building, which was described; (2) all choses in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wynne v. State National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Leon v. J. Goldman & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Frees & Son v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. LeGierse & Co. v. KellumTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tanner v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Bewley v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Schulte v. Republic Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Jones & Nixon v. First State Bank of HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API