Leon v. J. Goldman & Son
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Wood. Tried below before the Hon. Felix J. McCord. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.
Leon & H. Blum, appellants, and three other mercantile firms, having separate claims against appellees, Goldman & Son, for goods sold, joined in this suit in the court below against Goldman & Son, and also against Forgotsen and Weinstein, both of whom are also appellees in this court. The petition fully set out the several causes of action of plaintiffs against the defendants, Goldman & Son, and then proceeded to allege, that defendants, Forgot-sen and Weinstein, had conspired with their co-defendants to defraud the creditors of the latter, and in pursuance of such…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Fort Worth v. ZanecettiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. TeichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Cobb v. H. C. Burt & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.