Legal Opinion

Mullen & Woods, Inc. v. 615 West 57th Street, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 9, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Although we are in accord with the conclusion of the trial court that the defendant’s alleged promise to pay additional commissions was within the Statute of Frauds, and, therefore, unenforcible, we do not agree that there was an implied contract to pay such additional commissions in the event that the tenant exercised its option to renew the lease.

In the absence of special agreement, the plaintiff would not be entitled to commissions on subsequent extensions of which it was not the procuring cause. Nor could the plaintiff recover on the theory that by securing the inclusion of the renewal…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Hutchinson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Eastern Associates, Inc. v. SarubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Mitchnik v. BrennanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  4. Griffith v. Seco Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Rosenfeld Realty Co. v. Cadence Industries Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API