Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2014No. 2012-KA-00724-SCTPublished

1ConcurrenceKitchens, Justice

¶ 27. Our constitutional guarantees that the accused have assistance of counsel require reversal of Hill’s conviction. Thus, I concur with the disposition. U.S. Const, amend. VI (“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”); Miss. Const, art. 3, § 26 (“In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have a right to be heard by himself or counsel, or both....”). The Court correctly finds that a conflict of interest arose during trial and that Hill’s court-appointed counsel, Stephanie Mallette, should not have been…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API