Legal Opinion
State v. Hale
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 16, 1987No. 86-1349PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Judge.
The state appeals from the trial judge’s ruling which suppressed two admissions made by Hale implicating him in a burglary and grand theft case. We have jurisdic*1110tion. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The basis for the trial judge’s ruling was that the booking clerk at the Altamonte Springs police station failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(c), and thereafter Hale made the two statements. We reverse.
Rule 3.111(c) (Duty of Booking Officer) provides:
In addition to any other duty, the officer who commits a defendant to custody has the following duties:(1)He…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RichardsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. LamarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. RichardsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. LámarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989