Legal Opinion

State v. Lamar

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 1989No. 88-1770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Judge.

Following Jorge Lamar’s arrest for murder, Lamar was taken to the police station and informed of his Miranda rights. He refused to speak and requested an attorney. As the officer was preparing to end the interview, Lamar made the following statement: “I got away with the murder in Chicago, and I’ll get away with this one.” The officer asked Lamar to clarify the statement and Lamar further remarked: “I beat it, and I’ll beat this one.” The trial court denied Lamar’s motion to suppress but granted his motion in limine to exclude the post-arrest statements. The state appeals the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Parrish v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. State v. PalmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  5. State v. BreaSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. St. Louis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Manly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. State v. LámarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API