Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bates

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Dixon county. Tried, below before Powers, J. cited: Dillon v. Linder. 36 Wis. 344; Davis v. Justice, 31 O. St. 363; Bar-net v. National Bank, 8 Otto, 559; Potter’s Dwarris on Statutes, pp. 162, 228, 229, 275. cited: Ashton, v. Jones, 14 Neb. 428.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The defendants in error brought an action in the district-court of Dixon county against the plaintiffs in error, who-are saloon keepers, to recover for loss of means of support caused by intoxicating liquors furnished by the plaintiffs in error to the husband of Lucy A. Bates, and father of' the defendants in error, who are minors. On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict for $600 in favor of' the defendants in error, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the verdict.

A large number of errors are assigned. The first relates to the petition,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hauth v. SamboNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. BrennauerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Cornelius v. HultmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Murphy v. GouldNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. West v. Leiphart & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API