Legal Opinion

Rosenfield v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 18, 1951No. Civ. A. 219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

83 A.2d 843 (1951)

ROSENFIELD

v.

STANDARD ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT CORP. et al.

Civ. A. 219.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

October 18, 1951.

Aaron Finger (of Richards, Layton & Finger), Wilmington, John F. Reddy, Jr., and Philip D. Straffin (of Engel, Judge, Miller & Sterling), New York City, for plaintiff.

John VanBrunt, Jr., (of Killoran & VanBrunt), Wilmington, Mitchell Salem Fisher and Mendel Zucker, New York City, for defendants.

SEITZ, Chancellor.

Plaintiff brought this action under Sec. 31 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, Rev.Code 1935, § 2063, to review an annual stockholders'…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Scale and Supply Corp. v. ChappelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BorstNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  3. Rosenfield v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. Frederick Johnston Sandra Spillane v. Arbitrium (Cayman Islands) Handels Ag Miklos VendelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. North American Uranium & Oil Corp. v. South Texas Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  3. H. Frederick Johnston Sandra Spillane v. Arbitrium (Cayman Islands) Handels Ag Miklos VendelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API