Union Insurance v. Billman
Medina Circuit Court
Error.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
The relation of tbe parties bere is tbe reverse of tbeir relation below. Tbe defendant in error recovered a verdict and judgment on an insurance policy for a partial loss by fire. Her third amended petition, which embodied the policy, shows that after the fire she paid to the plaintiff in error’s agent an assessment which was then so long overdue that (as decided on a former review of this case) her insurance stood suspended. But the plaintiff alleges waiver. The agent remitted the money to his company, which, however, returned to him the portion covering the destroyed property, with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phenix Insurance v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Phœnix Insurance v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Universal Fire Insurance v. BlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Schoneman v. Western Horse & Cattle InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.