Legal Opinion

Hicks v. United States

United States Court of Military Commission Review

Decided February 18, 2015No. CMCR 13-004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

SILLIMAN, Deputy Chief Judge:

Appellant urges us to set aside his guilty plea to providing material support to terrorism, in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 950v(b)(25) (2006), and the sentence based on Al Bahlul v. United States, 767 F.3d 1 (D.C.Cir.2014) (en banc). Appellant asks that we find his waiver of his right to appellate review ineffective, and asserts that once we determine this case is properly before us, Al Bahlul dictates the outcome in his case.

Appellee counters that appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal is a jurisdictional bar to our review of his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Khadr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  5. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Al Bahlul v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API