Legal Opinion

Marion Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.

It is conceded by appellant tbat tbe taxes must be collected in accordance with tbe valuation and assessment as existent and as fixed by tbe official board, and tbat unless this can be properly corrected, no recovery can be bad for tbe moneyed demand by reason of tbe taxes heretofore paid. Guano Co. v. New Bern, 172 N. C., p. 260; Pickens v. Comrs., 112 N. C., p. 699; Stanly v. Board of Supervisors, 121 U. S., p. 535.

And as to tbe other' relief sought in tbe complaint to compel a reassessment of appellant’s property by defendants as tbe local board of equalization, tbe question is one very…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Committee on Grievances of the North Carolina State Bar Ass'n v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Hart v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Duke v. State ex rel. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Catholic Society of Religious & Literary Education v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Stocks v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API