Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a final decree. The decree, as entered, is alleged to be in violation of the labor law (29 USCA § 104 (a, e, g-i). The ease was here before [61 F.(2d) 115], where we reversed the lower court, and that reversal was affirmed by the Supreme Court (289 U. S. 103, 53 S. Ct. 549, 77 L. Ed. 1062). We directed that the bill be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction unless the appellees amended so as to correct the jurisdictional defect by striking from the bill a number of defendants. Below the court permitted the amendment and enjoined the present…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Wilson & Co. v. BirlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Donnelly Garment Co. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- United Electric Coal Companies v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Donnelly Garment Co. v. DubinskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.