Friedlander v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment entered on decision dismissing the complaint, with costs. Action to compel defendant to remove a certain fence in front of plaintiff’s premises- and a railroad gate across Washington street, Saratoga Springs.
1Per curiam
The learned justice, who tried this case, wrote a very able, clear and exhaustive opinion.
We think it unnecessary to add anything to what he said; and we, therefore, affirm the judgment on his opinion, with costs.
Tappajst, J.
—The defendant is a railroad corporation organized under the laws of this state and is the lessee of the railroad and franchise of the Rensselaer & Saratoga Railroad Company, and the Saratoga & Schenectady Railroad Company, and is in the use and occupation of such railroad.
The track of the last named railroad crosses a public street in the village of Saratoga Springs,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Phelps v. . NowlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Chaffee v. Boston Belting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1859
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.