Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 28, 1997No. 15319-3-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

— Between March 26, 1988, and June 22, 1988, Stephen Watlack executed two wills. The first will named his children as beneficiaries and the second will disinherited them in favor of the children of his favorite brother. The trial court set aside the second will as the product of an insane delusion and admitted the first will to probate. The personal representative and beneficiaries of the second will appeal. We hold that the facts support the trial court’s conclusion that Mr. Watlack was suffering from an insane delusion at the time he executed the second will.

FACTS

Stephen Watlack was born on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Estate of NiehenkeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Owen v. CrumbaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. In Re Klein's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carlton v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Carlton v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. In Re Estate of BlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API