United States v. Hubenka
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A second superceding indictment charged John Edward Hubenka with three counts of discharging pollutants into the Wind River in violation of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 1319(c)(2)(A). A jury found Hubenka guilty on all three counts. Hubenka appeals his convictions. He argues his activities on the Wind River lie beyond the reach of the Clean Water Act. Hubenka also contends the district court violated Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence when it admitted into evidence certain testimony about Hubenka’s past activities on the Wind…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Aposhian v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Northern California River Watch v. City of HealdsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.