Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McDougald Bros. & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1912No. 4447PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Statesboro—Judge Strange. September 11, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

1. Where one secures the benefit of the labor of another, upon, a promise to pay his debt to one with whom the debtor has contracted to work, and the laborer is released by the employer from his contract to labor, there is a sufficient consideration to support the promise. Civil Code (1910), § 4242.

2. There was no plea of the statute of frauds (Tift v. Wight, 113 Ga. 681, 39 S. E. 503), and the only question made by the record is that, dealt with in the foregoing headnote. Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. CothernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913