Legal Opinion
Fischbach v. New Mexico Activities Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1994No. 93-2251PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant New Mexico Activities Association (“NMAA”) appeals a district court order preliminarily enjoining it from precluding Plaintiff-appellee Craig Fiseh-baeh’s participation in interscholastic sports. This action, however, has ceased to be a case or controversy as required by Article III of the United States Constitution. We are thus without jurisdiction and we dismiss the appeal as moot.
Background,
Craig Fischbach was not allowed the opportunity to participate in interscholastic sports at Albuquerque’s La Cueva High School in the fall of 1993…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Catherine Walsh, Etc. v. Louisiana High School Athletic Association, Lutheran High School Association of Greater New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bauchman v. West High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Lane v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District No. 38Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Disability Law Center v. Millcreek Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.