Legal Opinion
Flour Exchange Building Corp. v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1994No. C0-94-1191, C2-94-1192PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The Flour Exchange Building Corporation (FEBC) commenced this action against the State of Minnesota and Dana Badgerow in her capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Administration (the State), alleging that the State was required to continue leasing space in the Flour Exchange Building (the Building), pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.24, subd. 6(c) (1992) which grants a leasing preference to historically significant buildings and that it violated the statute by leasing space elsewhere.
The trial court denied the State’s motion for summary judgment. The State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- John W. Merriam v. Robert L. Kunzig, Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Haage v. SteiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Buck v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Midway Massage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.