Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. v. Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 23, 2024No. 1:18-cv-00825Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-00825 Judge Franklin U. Valderrama CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEM USA INC. and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD., Defendants. REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 This is a patent lawsuit in which the Plaintiff Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., (Choice) alleges that Defendants Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc., and Contec Medical Systems Co., Ltd. (collectively, Contec) infringe on Choice’s

U.S. Patent No. 8,639,308

(the ‘308 patent),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API