In Re the Liquidation of Home Savings Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Petitioner, appellant, contends that it is agreed that appellant paid the amount of the deposit and took an assignment and subrogation receipt. If the court decides that the deposit was money of the United States and was entitled to priority as such within the contemplation of section 3466, Rev. Stat. of U. S., the appellant will be subrogated to all priority rights of the United States. Appellee concedes this.
The respondent, appellee, contends that having elected to file its assignment and subrogation receipt without claiming a preference, petitioner is now estopped from seeking a preference.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Smith, Special Dp. Bank. Com. v. Spicer's Gdn. and Com.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fairbanks v. . Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Stony Island State Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Reichert v. Berlin State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Hughey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Hughey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.