Legal Opinion

Haehl v. Village of Port Chester

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 21, 1978No. 75 CIV 307, 75 CIV 308, 75 CIV 1629 and 76 CIV 2912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

These consolidated actions for personal injury and wrongful death have been brought by the victims of a fire and their representatives. The present motion is brought by a third-party defendant, the Town of Greenwich, Connecticut. Greenwich contends that as a matter of law it is not liable to the defendant/third party plaintiffs, and seeks an order dismissing the third-party complaints pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(c) or for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56.

I. Conflicts of Laws

The fire which gives rise to plaintiffs’ actions occurred on the night of June…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Riss v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. McGrath v. STANLEY CARVERMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API