Legal Opinion
State v. Missouri
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 12, 2002No. 3563PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
The Circuit Court found Victor Wyatt Missouri had “standing” to challenge the drug evidence introduced against him based on a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The State appeals, arguing Missouri did not have “standing” to challenge the drug evidence. We reverse.
FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In early 1995, Greenville detectives were investigating a crack cocaine ring. On February 3, 1995, the police obtained a warrant to search the apartment of Curtis Sibert for cocaine. When the police executed the search warrant, they found Missouri in the kitchen standing over a sink, facing a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MissouriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. MissouriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002