Winter Iron Works v. Toy

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment dissolving the attachment sued out in this case.

The attachment was procured on the sworn allegation that the defendant resides out of the State. He contends that, at the the date of the attachment, he resided in the parish of East Baton Rouge, in this State.

We think it clear, from the evidence, that he did so.

The appellant’s counsel indeed seems to admit that the defendant in part resided in this State, but urges that, as the State of Indiana was the domicil of his origin, and he had not remained uninterruptedly in the State for any entire year…