Cranel Inc. v. Pro Image Consultants Group, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Partial Motions to Dismiss (docs. 39, 40, & 42). For the reasons that follow, the Court will GRANT the Defendants’ Motions and DISMISS the remaining state law claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
I. Background
The following allegations are taken from the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (doc. 36).
The Plaintiff, Cranel Inc., is an Ohio corporation that provides information technology solutions and services to customers throughout North America. Am. Compl. at ¶ 11, doc. 36. The Plaintiff specifically provides…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- RN Entm't, LLC v. ClementDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- AlixPartners, LLP and AlixPartners Holdings, LLP v. David BenichouCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019