Legal Opinion

Caine & Estes Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Watts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1982No. 21759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Watts appeals the order of the trial court upholding the validity of an employment agreement between the parties and ordering its specific performance. Watts asserts the non-competing clause contained in the agreement renders it invalid. We disagree and affirm.

While employed with respondent Caine & Estes Insurance Company in Greenville, South Carolina, Watts executed two agreements with the Company.

First, an employment agreement with a non-competing clause, dated August 1974; and second, an agreement for the sale of stock and to preserve good will, dated August 1978.

Sub…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Almers v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Standard Register Co. v. KerriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. General Electric Co. v. Lions GateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chapman & Drake v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Prestwick Golf Club, Inc. v. Prestwick Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Wolf v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Rockford Manufacturing, Ltd. v. BennetDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API