Caine & Estes Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Watts
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant Watts appeals the order of the trial court upholding the validity of an employment agreement between the parties and ordering its specific performance. Watts asserts the non-competing clause contained in the agreement renders it invalid. We disagree and affirm.
While employed with respondent Caine & Estes Insurance Company in Greenville, South Carolina, Watts executed two agreements with the Company.
First, an employment agreement with a non-competing clause, dated August 1974; and second, an agreement for the sale of stock and to preserve good will, dated August 1978.
Sub…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Almers v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Standard Register Co. v. KerriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- General Electric Co. v. Lions GateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chapman & Drake v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Prestwick Golf Club, Inc. v. Prestwick Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Wolf v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Rockford Manufacturing, Ltd. v. BennetDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.