Legal Opinion

Howard v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1995No. 92-CF-1019, 92-CF-1200Published

1Opinion of the Court

656 A.2d 1106 (1995)

Charles R. HOWARD, Jr., Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Ronald WILLIS, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Nos. 92-CF-1019, 92-CF-1200.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued September 28, 1994.

Decided February 6, 1995.

As Amended February 23 and March 30, 1995.

Douglas Wham, appointed by the court, for appellant Howard.

Monoranjan Bezboruah, appointed by the court, for appellant Willis.

Robert T. Swanson, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Atty., and John R. Fisher, Roy W. McLeese, III, and Robert Walker, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API