Legal Opinion

Sanderlin v. Hutchens, Senter & Britton, P.A.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2011No. 3:11-cv-00213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“Motion for TRO”) (Doc. No. 1) and Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”) (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ IFP Application for the limited purpose of reviewing the Complaint and Motion for TRO. Because this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Complaint sua sponte against all named Defendants.

I. Motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aylward v. City of CharlotteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
  2. GIBSON v. PARNELLDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  3. NGUYEN v. CHOICE HOME WARRANTYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  4. Rodgers v. NVR Inc.-Ryan HomesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
  5. Wang v. NYZ Management Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API