Pritchett v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This action is to recover damages for the loss of an eye and other injuries caused, as the plaintiff alleges, by the negligence of the defendant in a failing to furnish him a safe place to work, and in not providing a shield to protect him from brass chips falling from a boring mill.
The defendant denies negligence and alleges that the injury to the plaintiff was an accident, or that it was caused by his contributory negligence, or was the result of one of those risks assumed as a part of his employment.
All of the evidence is not set out, but enough to consider the motion of the defendant for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cotton v. North Carolina R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Blevins v. Erwin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Hudson v. Charleston, Cincinnati & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Shives v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Kiger v. Liipfert Scales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Pigford v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.