Legal Opinion

Mull v. Jones

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 4, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by De Witt Mull and Gottlieb Frommer against Henry M. Jones, Walter M. Jackson, as assignee of Isaac P. Bowers, and Jacob J. Vreeland and other defendants to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants Jones and Jackson appeal from a judgment for plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.

This is an appeal by defendants Jones and Jackson from a judgment of this court entered upon the report of a referee, in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed December 4, 1888, by Mull & Frommer, subcontractors, for plastering work, etc., under Bowers & Vreeland, contractors with Henry M. Jones, owner, for altering a certain building in the city of Hew York. The plaintiffs were to receive $587 for their work when it was all completed. At the time of the filing of their lien all was completed, with the exception of pointing up the plastering after the other mechanics had left the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodward v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Flaherty v. . MinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Foster v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Close v. ClarkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. Watts-Campbell Co. v. YuenglingNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schulte v. Lestershire Boot & Shoe Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API