Brooks v. Thompson
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
Decedent, John Clayton Thompson, purchased a policy of insurance upon his life, naming his wife as primary beneficiary. As contingent or alternate beneficiary he named his mother-in-law, Mrs. Dora Ann Brooks.
As the case comes before this Court, there is no question but that the wife felo-niously killed her husband, the insured. Accordingly her rights in the insurance policy are forfeited by reason of the provisions of T.C.A. § 31-207, hereinafter set out. The wording of the policy provisions is such that the contingent beneficiary was to receive the proceeds only if…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Bullock v. Expressmen's Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Beck v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Baekgaard v. CarreiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crawford v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Spencer v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Lee v. AylwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Carter v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Diep v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.