Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Thompson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

Decedent, John Clayton Thompson, purchased a policy of insurance upon his life, naming his wife as primary beneficiary. As contingent or alternate beneficiary he named his mother-in-law, Mrs. Dora Ann Brooks.

As the case comes before this Court, there is no question but that the wife felo-niously killed her husband, the insured. Accordingly her rights in the insurance policy are forfeited by reason of the provisions of T.C.A. § 31-207, hereinafter set out. The wording of the policy provisions is such that the contingent beneficiary was to receive the proceeds only if…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Bullock v. Expressmen's Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Beck v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. Baekgaard v. CarreiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Spencer v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Lee v. AylwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Carter v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Diep v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API