Legal Opinion

Indeck v. Clients' Security Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 2008PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

The Clients’ Security Fund (Fund) was established by the Supreme Judicial Court (court) in 1974. S.J.C. Rule 4:04, 365 Mass. 717 (1974). “The purpose of the Fund is to discharge, as far as practicable and in a reasonable manner, the collective professional responsibility of the members of the Massachusetts bar with respect to losses caused to the public by defalcation of members of the bar, acting either as attorneys or as fiduciaries . . . .” S.J.C. Rule 4:04, as amended, 428 Mass. 1302 (1998). The Fund’s resources come not through an appropriation of public monies, but from the annual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Porter v. Clerk of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. MacKenzie v. School Committee of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. City of Revere v. Massachusetts Gaming CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. EventMonitor, Inc. v. LenessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Frawley v. Police Commissioner of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Hoffer v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API