Connolly v. Commercial Nat. Bank in Shreveport

DAWKINS, Chief Judge.

It has been called to my attention that, in the memorandum opinion interpreting the decree and mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals, 5 Cir., 176 F.2d 1004; 177 F.2d 514, handed down by me on the 28th day of April, 1950, D.C., 89 F.Supp. 976, for the purpose of entering a proper final judgment in the above case, this court failed to indicate which method of calculating the tax savings as between “B” and *265“C” assets should be used, that is, the one suggested by plaintiff and intervenors, or the other proposed by defendant.

It is my belief that the organ of the court in the…