Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Farmer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

On October 4, 1962, Mrs. Marie Abbott was taken to Providence hospital in Portland. On October 6, 1962, she died intestate. Sometime during that interval her grandnephew, defendant Farmer, acquired from her $10,000 in cash. This is an action by the administrator of her estate to recover the money. However, Marie’s husband, Wilbur Abbott, was Marie’s sole heir, and is the real party in interest. Farmer claimed that he received the money as a gift. The jury agreed with him. Plaintiff appeals. The most extensive part of the argument here is that the court erred in failing to direct a verdict for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bergsvik v. BergsvikOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Booher v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Reif v. BotzOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Charleston v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. UnisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gould, Larson, Bennet, Wells & McDonnell, P.C. v. PanicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Trustees of Baker University v. Trustees of the Endowment Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Herrig v. HerrigMontana Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API