Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Morrison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff’ from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Vanderburgh, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The cause of action set up in the complaint is based upon the following facts : That the defendant was engaged in running a cotton mill; that the plaintiff, a boy of fourteen years, was, with the consent of his father, employed by the defendant as a common laborer to serve and work at and about the elevator in the mill; that after such employment the defendant, without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff’s father or of plaintiff, improperly, wrongfully and negligently directed and required plaintiff to quit such employment, and serve the defendant in feeding, working and clearing a picking…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Levey v. BigelowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Bohn Manuf'g Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Vohs v. A. E. Shorthill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Wilson v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API