Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Sorensen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 21, 1958PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 So.2d 10 (1958)

Myrtle R. RUTH and her husband, William E. Ruth, Appellants,

v.

Elmer SORENSEN, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 21, 1958.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1958.

Paul L. Steiner, Miami, for appellants.

Henry Burnett and Fowler, White, Gillen, Yancey & Humkey, Miami, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellants sued defendant-appellee to recover their respective damages as a result of injuries sustained by the plaintiff wife ("plaintiff" hereafter), when the car she was driving was hit by a car driven by defendant. The cause was submitted to the jury on the question of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. 6551 Collins Avenue Corp. v. MillenSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. State v. SpazianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Chomont v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Pierce v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API