Legal Opinion

Rottenberg v. Rottenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. Gtjlotta, J.

This is an application for a certificate of reasonable doubt, which is authorized only after conviction in a criminal case. (Matter of Giroffi, 283 App. Div. 890.) Both *1032sides have candidly admitted they are in doubt as to whether this is the proper remedy because they are unable to conclude whether article II-A (L. 1960, ch. 770, eff. April 21,1960) of the Nassau County District Court Act (L. 1939, chs. 274, 718, .719, 720) under which the defendant was tried, is a penal or civil' statute. They ask for a clarification and determination of the-purpose, intent and meaning of that statute.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Comrs. of Charities v. . CullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Stolofsky v. Superintendent of State InstitutionNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. People v. ChlebowyNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. KennewegNew York District Court · 1960
  5. Rottenberg v. RottenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API