Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Stolofsky v. Superintendent of State Institution

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The return to the writ of habeas corpus herein pleads a commitment by the county judge of Onondaga county as authority for the detention of the relator. The commitment, dated November 15, 1925, shows that the relator, “ arraigned, indicted for or con victed of the crime of Vagrancy,” was twenty-five years of age and had been certified as a mentally defective person by two duly qualified examiners of mental defect. The certificate states that the relator had been arrested and convicted three times for annoying little girls;.that he was, among other things, easily angered, excitable, impulsive,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Burke v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Steinert v. SobeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. People v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fenster v. LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. ChlebowyNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Erway v. MacAfferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Fenster v. Criminal Court of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API