Legal Opinion

Saum v. Reppert

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1995No. C019017Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment in an action for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Lisle Steven Saum’s claimed right-of-way easements over property owned by Leroy and Sally Reppert.

The Repperts answered the Saum complaint and filed a cross-complaint. Saum failed to answer the cross-complaint and his default was entered. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment. He argues that the judgment is based on a default that is void because it was taken to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Brooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Crofton v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API