Legal Opinion

Darling v. Kansas Water Office

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 26, 1989No. 62,249PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Plaintiffs herein were classified employees of the Kansas Water Office (KWO). In 1984, the Kansas Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 501 (L. 1984, ch. 285), which changed plaintiffs’ jobs from being in the classified service of the Kansas Civil Service Act, K.S.A. 75-2925 et seq., to being unclassified and directed their termination. Plaintiffs were terminated and appealed their terminations to the Civil Service Board, which held it had no jurisdiction as plaintiffs were no longer classified employees. Plaintiffs appealed the Board’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Bruce v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. In Re the Marriage of SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Rea v. MatteucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API