Legal Opinion
Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 8, 2021No. 3:17-cv-04738Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-04738-WHO Plaintiff, Case No. 3:21-cv-02143-WHO 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 GOPRO, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 559, 576 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) asserted an affirmative defense of inequitable conduct 14 against plaintiff Contour IP Holdings, LLC (“Contour”) in the second of these consolidated patent 15 infringement suits. I previously granted Contour’s motion to strike the defense but allowed GoPro 16 to seek leave to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.