Legal Opinion

Spillers v. Lafever

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1958No. 8 Div. 256PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Action claiming $1,328.44 due on a note secured by a chattel mortgage, both of which instruments were given to one George W. Beene (intestate) by Lafever. Spillers, according to the amended complaint, is alleged to be an assignee of the note and mortgage as an agent for collection for the benefit of Beene’s administratrix.

The jury found for the defendant on an affirmative instruction by the trial judge.

The evidence showed Spillers did not have the instrument indorsed to him until after commencement of the action, viz., on the date of trial. The indorsement was restricted (Code…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Bank of Tallassee v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Quast v. RugglesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Beason v. South Carolina Bank of GreenvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Department of Indus. RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Arlington Properties, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API