Legal Opinion

Newhouse v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 4, 1992No. 91-1802PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company appeals a summary judgment holding that it breached its duty to defend its insured, Floyd Omann. The judgment awards Floyd's assignee, Robert Newhouse, over $724,000, the amount of the judgment against Floyd in an underlying personal injury action. The judgment also awards costs and fees for frivolous claims Citizens filed seeking contribution against Floyd and his attorney. In a previous appeal arising out of the personal injury action, this court held that Floyd had coverage under Citizens' $50,000 homeowner's liability policy. Newhouse v. Laidig,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mowry v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States Fire Insurance v. Good Humor Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Fire Insurance Exchange v. BastenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Delta Group, Inc. v. DBI, INC.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Scheideler Ex Rel. Tlusty v. Smith & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API