Legal Opinion
Beemus v. Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 2, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRACI, J.:
¶ 1 In this civil class action commenced by Appellees, Fred and Cathi Beemus (the “Beemuses”), Appellant, Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc. (“Primus”), appeals from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on March 5, 2002 denying Primus’s preliminary objection to Count II of the Beemuses’ complaint.1 We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 The Beemuses purchased an automobile from Mackay-Swift, Inc. (“Mackay”) on June 17, 1997. The Beemuses also purchased a service contract from Mackay that was issued by Interstate National Dealer Services,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. KnollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- 1726 Cherry Street Partnership v. Bell Atlantic Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Felde v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Knight v. Springfield HyundaiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. CONSUMER'S CHOICE FOODS, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Comer v. PERSON AUTO SALES, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Beemus v. Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- CHIJIOKE-UCHE v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.