Legal Opinion
Purcell v. DiLeonardo
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1994No. B074041PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Appellant Sharon Purcell DiLeonardo is a one-sixth beneficiary of the income from the trust. Respondents Helen True Purcell, Lauri Ann Prati, and Michael L. Purcell are the other five-sixths beneficiaries of the trust income. Wells Fargo Bank is the trustee.
Appellant filed objections to the trustee’s third account. The court summarily adjudicated that appellant’s objections lacked merit, and settled and approved the third account. The order approving the third account is the subject of a separate appeal. We have affirmed that order in an unpublished opinion, Estate of Ivey (Feb. 17,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Patterson v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Ungrich v. UngrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Kuhns v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of IvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994