Legal Opinion
The Confederated Salish And Kootenai Tribes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2003No. 02-35491PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
343 F.3d 1193
The CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Acting By and Through the Secretary of the Department of Interior, Gale NORTON; Bureau of Indians Affairs, U.S. Department of Interior, Stanley Speaks, Northwest Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-35491.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted August 6, 2003 — Seattle, Washington.
Filed September 15, 2003.
John B. Carter, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Tribal Legal Department, Pablo, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellant.
William W. Mercer, Office of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013