Legal Opinion

Law v. Texas State Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 1135—5080PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

We refer to the opinion of •the Court of Civil Appeals, 3 S.W.(2d) 505, for a general statement of the case.

The second stipulation as reproduced in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is tantamount to an unqualified declaration that “the agents of this company” have “authority to represent it * * * in the solicitation of applications for insurance.”

Scott testified that he was (at date of trial) “a solicitor of fire insurance for * * * Texas Mutual Fire Insurance Company,” and had been such for a period including dates of the policies sued upon. “I just take a written application from…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Crescent Insurance v. Griffin & ShookTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Texas State Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. LawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Lake Dallas Gin Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Terry v. Texas Prudential Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Lee v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Chattanooga v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Adams v. Lasalle Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API